Showing posts with label Texas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Texas. Show all posts

Saturday, December 11, 2010

I want Cliff Lee, but if he wants Texas, so be it

Good e-migo Maury Brown tweeted this not that long ago, and he’s right:

After lat night, if the Yankees add an eighth year to their offer, this will be more about losing to the Rangers than getting Cliff Lee.

The Yankees are in bed with over $618 million of committments through 2018, just ahead of Evil Empire II who are now on the hook for?almost the same amount over the same period of time:

The Red Sox have $594.75 million in salary commitments through 2018, not quite $19 million less than the Yankees’ $613.28 million. The Yankees’ committed dollars are just a little more than 3% greater than those of the Red Sox.

This should not be “CLIFF LEE AT ANY COST”. It just shouldn’t, but it feels like it’s turning into just that. Sure, if Lee stays in Texas, it’s possible Pettitte decides to hang ‘em up, too. That would leave two gaping holes in the rotation. Cashman could very easily* try to?trade the entire farm system for Zack Greinke or lefties Johan Santana or Francisco Liriano. We’ll address that if it comes to that, to be sure.

* It would be easy to try, not easy to execute; just wanted to make that clear.

My colleague Larry, in discussing the success of the RedSox over the last week, puts it quite well and we can adapt the rational thought for Cliff Lee:

As a Yankees fan, all I can say is congratulations. There’s no way I can feel bitter about the Sox’s success in this week’s winter meetings. The Sox did what the Yankees usually do (and may still do, before this post-season is over): they parlayed their money advantage into the signing of a couple of terrific ballplayers. IIATMS, that’s the way the game is played.

If the Yanks are outbid, they’re outbid. It would be among the rarest events in the baseball world, but it can happen. We’ll have to lick our wounds and just go out and play like mad this Spring and Summer.? World Series titles are not awarded in December. There are games to play.?? That’s what every other team has said after a Yankees spending spree. Now it’s our turn, IF Cliff Lee lands in Texas.

If he chooses the Yanks, we’ll hear all about “the Yanks are buying a title” yet again. It is about the money.

-

And if Lee takes Texas’ tax-advantaged money:

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Saturday, November 6, 2010

The Battle for Cliff Lee (Texas and Taxes)

Let’s start with basic principles.? The first state to get a crack at Cliff Lee’s income is the state where he lives.? Cliff Lee currently lives in Arkansas.? Arkansas has a state income tax, with a top rate of 7%.? So long as Cliff Lee resides in Arkansas, he’s going to have to pay state income taxes regardless of whether his baseball team is based in Texas or New York.

Of course, it’s possible for Cliff Lee to move his family to Texas, in which case he won’t have to pay income taxes to Arkansas.? But Cliff Lee can do this even if he plays for the Yankees.

If this sounds simple to you, good!? Because I’m about to make things a lot more complicated.

Certain states?impose income taxes on people who work in that state but live in another state.? These taxes are called “nonresident income taxes”.? I bet a lot of you are familiar with these taxes.? If you live in New Jersey or Connecticut and work in New York, you’re subject to New York’s nonresident income tax scheme.? ?New York’s top income tax rate is 6.85%.? So if Cliff Lee works in New York, his income earned in New York is going to be taxed in New York regardless of whether he lives in Arkansas or Texas.

Let’s make this more confusing.? Even if Cliff Lee pitches for Texas, he’s going to have to pay New York’s nonresident income tax.? Why?? Because regardless of the logo on Cliff Lee’s jersey, sometimes Cliff Lee pitches in Yankee Stadium.? If Lee performs in New York, he’s subject to the nonresident income tax.? It doesn’t matter whether he pitches for the home team or the visitors.

This is the situation for every major league baseball player.? When Derek Jeter plays in Anaheim or Oakland, he becomes subject to California’s nonresident income tax.? If the All-Star Game is held in Chicago, every all-star becomes subject to Illinois’ nonresident income tax.? ?Most baseball teams are located in states with non-resident income taxes.? The only exceptions are the Mariners, Marlins, Rays, Astros and Rangers.

You have to pity the poor guy who prepares? Derek Jeter’s tax returns (or envy him, since he probably makes a lot of money).? Half of Jeter’s Yankees salary is taxed by the State of New York.? But Jeter plays 9 games each year in Boston, so Massachusetts gets to tax 1/18 of this income.? If Jeter plays three games in Oakland and four in Anaheim, then California gets its share of 7/162 of Jeter’s baseball salary.? Of course, these fractions need to be adjusted if Jeter plays in the All-Star game or makes it to the post-season.? To make things worse, there are cities such as Cleveland and Philly that impose city income taxes on nonresidents.? And when Jeter travels to Toronto … well, let’s leave Canada out of this discussion.

But let’s turn our attention back to Cliff Lee.? Regardless of where Lee plays or lives, he’s going to pay state income taxes to a bunch of different states, and he’s going to file state tax returns that will probably take up the better part of a file cabinet.? But there are things Lee can do to reduce his overall tax burden.? For example, Lee could remain with the Rangers and move his family to Texas.? If Lee’s residence and team were both based in Texas, Lee would not face state income tax liability for the 81 games he played each year in Texas.? In addition, he would not pay state income tax to any state for the games he played in Tampa Bay and Seattle (which, as you doubtless remember, are both located in states that don’t have an income tax).

But if Cliff and Kirsten Lee remain residents of Arkansas, it may not matter from a state income tax standpoint whether Lee remains a Ranger or joins the Yankees.? So long as Lee resides in Arkansas, he’ll owe state income taxes to that state for all of his income, regardless of where he earns it.? True, if Lee becomes a Yankee, he’ll play 81 games in New York, and that will increase the amount of nonresident income tax he’ll have to pay to the State of New York.? But whatever Lee has to pay to the New York tax collector can be deducted from what Lee has to pay to the authorities in Arkansas.? So long as Arkansas has a higher income tax rate than the one in effect in New York, Lee’s overall income tax burden will not be affected by wearing pinstripes.

That is, so long as Lee remains a resident of Arkansas … and does not move to a state with a lower tax rate than the one in effect in New York.

(The amount of money in the Arkansas State Treasury WILL be impacted by Lee’s decision … but that’s a topic for another post on someone else’s blog.)

I’m certain all this is perfectly clear.

Now, about that report that Lee was recently seen buying cowboy boots …

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here